Report loading
justsecure-ndiga8tn.manus.space
Preparing the full page inventory and screenshots.
Score
59
Issues
Analyzed
Report loading
Preparing the full page inventory and screenshots.
59 / 100
Fair
0 critical fixes · 2 quick wins
Priority verdict
59/100 - fair. Start with the fixes below before reading the full report.
The biggest issue is missing content-security-policy. Start with the priority fixes, then use the evidence and technical details when a developer needs proof.
Fair
3 priority fixes identified
Score
59 / 100 — Fair
No major launch blockers found.
Biggest risk
Missing Content-Security-Policy
visitor safety and trust
Fastest win
Missing Content-Security-Policy
A practical first fix for your builder or AI agent.
Estimated impact
Higher confidence and discoverability
Fix the priority items first, then re-scan to confirm the evidence.
Biggest area to improve: Security Headers, which mostly means visitor safety and trust.
Priority verdict
This site is technically inspectable, but the priority is making the next fix obvious.
Fix the highest-impact issue first, then use structured evidence and developer prompts so search engines, AI answer engines, and real visitors can understand the site more reliably.
What's working
What needs attention
What to do first
The JustSecure digital presence suffers from a high-priority security gap and significant accessibility barriers that undermine its professional credibility.
The platform demonstrates a strong visual identity, utilizing a professional dark-mode aesthetic and high-contrast typography that aligns with the cybersecurity sector. Technical foundations are partially present, including correctly configured Open Graph tags for social previews, a defined canonical URL, and proper right-to-left language directionality for Arabic users.
The most serious vulnerability is the absence of a Content-Security-Policy (CSP), which leaves the site exposed to cross-site scripting (XSS) and injection attacks. This is compounded by a high-priority accessibility failure where high-priority UI elements do not meet minimum color contrast ratios, potentially alienating users with visual impairments. Furthermore, the site lacks a visible privacy policy and a valid XML sitemap, creating both regulatory risk and search engine friction.
There is a significant opportunity to capture emerging AI-driven search traffic by optimizing for "answer engines." While the site is currently accessible to AI crawlers, it lacks the semantic structure, JSON-LD schema, and machine-readable content signals required for high-quality citations. By implementing a robust semantic hierarchy and structured data, JustSecure can transform from a passive target for crawlers into a primary, cited source for AI-generated security insights.
To stabilize the platform and mitigate immediate risk, the following actions must be prioritized in the next 30 days:
Scan details
Checks performed: SEO, UX, accessibility, performance, security, AI search.
Fix workflow
Treat this report as a queue: send the ready fixes, accept any intentional risks, then re-scan the production URL after changes land.
42
Ready to send
38
Not started
0
Accepted risk
0
Re-scan queued
The full report has all the proof. This is the owner-friendly version of what to do first.
Plain-English reason
This affects visitor safety and trust. PageLens marked it as important so you know where it belongs in the queue.
What to ask your builder or AI agent to do
Add a Content-Security-Policy header. Start restrictive: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'
No CSP header found. The site is vulnerable to XSS and injection attacks.
Plain-English reason
This affects whether everyone can use the site. PageLens marked it as important so you know where it belongs in the queue.
What to ask your builder or AI agent to do
Element matching `p[data-loc="client/src/pages/Home.tsx:190"]` has contrast ratio 4.29; WCAG AA requires 4.5:1. Increase the contrast between foreground and background colours (the Tailwind hint below proposes the next darker step in the same family if the offending class is a recognised palette utility). Reference: https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/color-contrast?application=playwright
Ensure the contrast between foreground and background colors meets WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds. Fix any of the following: Element has insufficient color contrast of 4.29 (foreground color: #577782, background color: #010305, font size: 13.5pt (18px), font weight: normal). Expected contrast ratio of 4.5:1
Plain-English reason
This affects visitor safety and trust. PageLens marked it as worth fixing so you know where it belongs in the queue.
What to ask your builder or AI agent to do
Increase max-age to at least 31536000 (1 year).
HSTS max-age is 2592000 seconds (recommended: >= 31536000).
A practical roadmap for turning the audit into progress.
Today
Add a Content-Security-Policy header. Start restrictive: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'
This week
Element matching `p[data-loc="client/src/pages/Home.tsx:190"]` has contrast ratio 4.29; WCAG AA requires 4.5:1. Increase the contrast between foreground and background colours (the Tailwind hint below proposes the next darker step in the same family if the offending class is a recognised palette utility). Reference: https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.11/color-contrast?application=playwright
This month
Increase max-age to at least 31536000 (1 year).
Same data as the full report, grouped by what a non-technical owner should do with it.
High-impact fixes that should usually be tackled before anything else.
Important fixes that may need more development time or a design decision.
Nothing in this bucket.
Polish and lower-priority work. Useful, but not where to start.
Need the detail?
The full report still has every finding, evidence, rule ID, filters, screenshots, and technical panels.
