Report loading
www.quickproof.ai
Preparing the full page inventory and screenshots.
Score
49
Issues
Analyzed
Report loading
Preparing the full page inventory and screenshots.
Poor
Health Score
Here's the simple version
49/100 - poor. Start with the fixes below before reading the full report. The _QuickProof_ website contains a **critical vulnerability** involving exposed secret keys and tokens within the page source that requires immediate remediation to prevent unauthorized backend access. The platform demonstrates strong technical foundations, specifically regarding user experience and core performance. The site maintains excellent Core Web Vitals, including a highly responsive Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) of 516ms, and utilizes sophisticated motion design via GSAP to drive visual engagement. Furthermore, the implementation of _SoftwareApplication_ schema provides a solid baseline for search engine and AI agent understanding. However, the site faces a serious security posture deficit. The absence of a Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header creates a high-priority risk for cross-site scripting (XSS) and injection attacks. This is compounded by the critical exposure of credentials in the HTML, which allows any user to extract sensitive tokens via a simple "View Source" command. These flaws undermine the professional credibility of an AI-driven platform. There is a significant opportunity to capture market share within the emerging AI-search ecosystem. While the site is currently accessible to AI crawlers, it lacks the specialized content depth required for commercial AI-search prompt coverage. By developing dedicated, crawlable pages for pricing, product catalogs, and detailed use cases, _QuickProof_ can ensure that answer engines accurately represent the product when users query for creative operations solutions. **First 30 Days** - Remove all exposed secret keys and tokens from the client-side source code and rotate all affected credentials immediately. - Implement a robust Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header to mitigate injection risks. - Publish a formal privacy policy and link it clearly in the site footer to meet regulatory requirements.
Poor
Health score
Launch blockers
1 urgent launch blocker needs attention.
The rest of the report is a fix queue, not a reason to panic.
Fix first
Start with the top 3.
These are the items most likely to improve trust, speed, or conversion.
Best next step
Hand the fix list to your builder or AI agent.
The technical detail is still here when they need evidence.
Biggest area to improve: Security Headers, which mostly means visitor safety and trust.
The full report has all the proof. This is the owner-friendly version of what to do first.
Plain-English reason
This affects visitor safety and trust. PageLens marked it as urgent so you know where it belongs in the queue.
What to ask your builder or AI agent to do
Move all secret keys to server-side environment variables. Never embed secrets in client-side code. Rotate any exposed key immediately — treat it as compromised. Use a secrets manager (e.g. AWS Secrets Manager, Vercel environment variables) and expose only publishable/public keys to the frontend.
Live API keys, secret tokens, or credentials are visible in the page HTML or inline JavaScript. Attackers can extract these from the browser's View Source and use them to access your backend services, send emails on your behalf, or exfiltrate data.
Plain-English reason
This affects visitor safety and trust. PageLens marked it as important so you know where it belongs in the queue.
What to ask your builder or AI agent to do
Add a Content-Security-Policy header. Start restrictive: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'
No CSP header found. The site is vulnerable to XSS and injection attacks.
Plain-English reason
This affects whether everyone can use the site. PageLens marked it as worth fixing so you know where it belongs in the queue.
What to ask your builder or AI agent to do
Add a `<label>` element for the email input. If a visual label is not desired, use a class to visually hide it while keeping it accessible to screen readers: `<label for='email' class='sr-only'>Work Email</label>`.
The email input field uses a placeholder instead of a permanent visible or hidden <label>. This can cause issues for users with cognitive disabilities or those using screen readers once the placeholder disappears during typing.
Same data as the full report, grouped by what a non-technical owner should do with it.
High-impact fixes that should usually be tackled before anything else.
Important fixes that may need more development time or a design decision.
Nothing in this bucket.
Polish and lower-priority work. Useful, but not where to start.
Need the detail?
The full report still has every finding, evidence, rule ID, filters, screenshots, and technical panels.
