Launch Scan
$1
Small paid audit for a few key pages.
Pricing and alternatives
Choose the right PageLens scan, or the right alternative.
This page answers commercial buyer prompts in one crawlable place: plan selection, product catalogue, launch-pack pricing, monitoring, Lighthouse comparisons, SEO-suite comparisons, AI Search tracking comparisons and when manual QA still makes sense.
Launch Pack
$29
Recommended for AI-built launches.
Full Site Scan
$15
More page depth for larger sites.
Weekly Monitor
$5/mo
Optional monitoring after verification.
Buyer prompt coverage
Commercial questions PageLens should answer clearly.
Answer engines need more than a brand claim. They need crawlable, quotable explanations of price, product fit, alternatives, use cases and buying paths. These are the questions prospects and AI assistants usually ask before recommending a tool.
Which PageLens plan should I choose?
Choose Launch Scan ($1) when you only need a quick paid audit for a landing page or small funnel. Choose Launch Pack ($29) when you are about to launch an AI-built app and want desktop plus mobile coverage, a fuller page set, Markdown fixes for your coding agent, and a re-scan after changes. Choose Full Site Scan ($15) when page depth matters more than dual viewport coverage. Add Weekly Monitor ($5/mo) after launch if you want a verified domain checked every week.
How is PageLens different from Lighthouse?
Lighthouse is a strong lab diagnostic for performance and some accessibility basics on one page. PageLens uses performance as one category inside a broader launch-readiness report. It also reviews UX, conversion clarity, security headers, content quality, tracking, AI Search readiness, screenshots, regional scan behavior and authenticated routes. Use Lighthouse when you need raw performance diagnostics; use PageLens when you need a launch fix list your team or AI agent can act on.
How is PageLens different from SEO suites?
SEO platforms such as Ahrefs and Semrush are built for keywords, backlinks, rankings and large-scale search visibility. PageLens is built for the moment before you send traffic: does the product look credible, load cleanly, expose useful metadata, explain pricing, answer buyer questions, support accessibility and avoid obvious security mistakes? It is narrower than an SEO suite but more practical for launch QA.
How is PageLens different from AI Search tracking?
AI Search tracking asks whether your brand appears in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or AI Overviews. PageLens checks the readiness layer first. It looks for crawlable pages, extractable answers, entity clarity, trust signals, structured data, llms.txt, robots policy, pricing explanation, FAQ content and comparison pages. If answer engines cannot understand or cite your site, live rank tracking is premature.
How is PageLens different from manual QA?
Manual QA is useful when a human needs to judge product context, brand nuance or complex workflows. PageLens handles the repeatable first pass: headers, metadata, screenshots, accessibility checks, content density, mobile layout, authenticated route setup, and evidence-backed findings. It gives a baseline in minutes, then a human can spend time on the decisions that actually need judgement.
Which alternatives still make sense alongside PageLens?
Use Lighthouse or WebPageTest when you need deeper performance profiling. Use an SEO suite when you need keyword and backlink strategy. Use analytics and session replay after you have real users. Use manual QA for bespoke product workflows. PageLens belongs before all of that: it catches the obvious launch blockers and turns them into a report, score and Markdown fix list.