Find the website fixes to make before you launch.
Review up to 15 public pages on desktop and mobile. Get prioritized fix instructions for your developer or coding agent.
Get Website Review · $9 USDOne payment includes a verification re-scan. Create an account, confirm your website and review the total before paying.
Try your website free
Preparing the website form…
Free website check
One public page's HTML and headers, up to three findings and a practical next step. No signup or card.
Website Review · $9 USD
Up to 15 public pages, desktop and mobile evidence, prioritized fixes, exports and one verification re-scan.
One-time USD price. No subscription required. Your report stays private by default.
Explore a website report before you buyLaunching soon? Help shape PageLens through the customer pilot.
A finding you can inspect before you buy.
The Quizora field test recorded 2.48:1 contrast for the optional Name label. The normal-text WCAG AA threshold is 4.5:1. Reproduce the finding on the current page before changing it.
Read the developer instructions and verification steps
Review the Quizora public signup form's Name (optional) label. Historical evidence: the PageLens field test on 9 September 2026 recorded 2.48:1 contrast for the normal-size 'optional' text. Reproduce against the current page before making a change; the screenshot is not a new contrast measurement. Use a darker text token so the label reaches at least 4.5:1 against its actual background. Preserve the exact wording, optional-field meaning, associated label, form behavior, brand and surrounding layout. Do not infer that disabled controls need the same treatment. Verify computed foreground/background colors in the browser, including opacity and inherited styles. Check desktop, mobile, zoom and focus/error states. Repeat the automated contrast check and inspect the rendered label. Report the files changed and before/after measurements. A passing contrast check does not establish full accessibility compliance or increased signup conversion.
Your paid review follows this workflow: inspect the captured evidence, give the fix instructions to your developer or coding agent, then use the included re-scan after implementing the change.
This historical example has no measured signup improvement. A re-scan checks the reviewed pages again; it does not prove that a change increased revenue.
From the page your visitors see to a change you can make.
- Inspect desktop and mobile captures alongside the findings.
- Review accessibility, performance, search and public security checks.
- Choose a priority, copy its fix instructions, make the change and recheck.
Recommendations about clarity and conversion are hypotheses to test. Automated checks are not a security certification or a human usability study. We do not promise higher rankings, signups or revenue.
